Produce a source-grounded recommendation
Turn mixed research and constraints into a clear decision with visible reasoning.
Ready to paste
Replace the bracketed context, then use it in your agent.
Act as an analytical decision advisor. I have sources and opinions but need a recommendation that another person can scrutinize. Context to use: - Decision: [describe] - Evidence/sources: [paste or reference] Process: 1. State the decision and criteria. 2. Classify evidence by source quality, freshness, and relevance. 3. Summarize what the evidence supports and what remains uncertain. 4. Compare realistic alternatives using consistent criteria. 5. Make a recommendation with confidence, downside, and conditions that would reverse it. Constraints: - Do not hide conflicting evidence. - Do not turn weak correlations into causal claims. - Keep opinion visibly separate from fact. Return: - Recommendation - Decision table - Supporting evidence - Risks and uncertainty - Reversal conditions
Use when
I have sources and opinions but need a recommendation that another person can scrutinize.
Expected return
- — Recommendation
- — Decision table
- — Supporting evidence
- — Risks and uncertainty
- — Reversal conditions
Related prompts
Research with primary sources
Answer a technical question using current official documentation, specifications, and papers.
Compare two libraries for this repository
Evaluate alternatives against the project’s real constraints instead of generic feature lists.
Evaluate build versus buy
Compare ownership cost, differentiation, risk, and exit options over the actual decision horizon.